Rebecca Walker’s article is making the rounds so I’m thinking about third wave feminism. Every time I look at Wikipedia’s definition of third wave feminism (I’m geeky like that) I wonder if anyone else is because it doesn’t look anything like current mainstream feminism.
What happened?
I had high hopes when Walker started Third Wave Foundation in May 1992 because most of the board members were young women of color.
The third wave grew out of a civil rights case:
In response to the Clarence Thomas–Anita Hill scandal, Rebecca Walker published an article in a 1992 issue of Ms. titled “Becoming the Third Wave” in which she stated, “I am not a post-feminism feminist. I am the third wave.” Hill and Thomas’ case brought attention to the ongoing presence of sexual harassment in the workplace and reinstated a sense of concern and awareness in many people who assumed that sexual harassment and other second wave issues had been resolved. Walker’s article generated several hundred letters of response, most from women under 30, inspiring Walker and activist Shannon Liss to found the Third Wave Direct Action Corporation (now known as Third Wave Foundation). This activist organization was founded to support and mobilize the power of young women to resist various manifestations of injustice.
The definition of third wave feminism doesn’t look like mainstream feminism:
Third-wave feminism seeks to challenge or avoid what it deems the second wave’s “essentialist” definitions of femininity, which (according to the third wave) often assumed a universal female identity and over-emphasized the experiences of upper middle class white women. A post-structuralist interpretation of gender and sexuality is central to much of third wave ideology. This accounts for the heightened emphasis on the discursive power and fundamental ambiguity inherent in all gender terms and categories. Third-wave theory usually encompasses queer theory, women of color consciousness, womanism, post-colonial theory, critical theory, transnationalism, ecofeminism, and new feminist theory.
The roots of third wave feminism don’t look like mainstream feminism either:
The roots of the Third Wave began, however, in the mid 1980s. Feminist leaders rooted in the second wave like Gloria Anzaldua, bell hooks, Chela Sandoval, Cherrie Moraga, Audre Lorde, Maxine Hong Kingston, and many other feminists of color, called for a new subjectivity in feminist voice. They sought to negotiate prominent space within feminist thought for consideration of race related subjectivities.
Even second wave founder Gloria Steinem’s first published feminist article piggybacked on the Civil Rights Movement. Her article, “After Black Power, Women’s Liberation (.pdf),” published in New York magazine even won an award:
Her first openly feminist essay was published in April, 1969, in New York and was titled, “After Black Power, Women’s Liberation.” In the article, Steinem observed that many women who had fought for civil rights for blacks and against the Vietnam War were beginning to fight for political causes such as equality and opportunity for women. For this article she won the Penney-Missouri Journalism Award.
Where’s the respect?
Then in 1995, Walker wrote To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism. In 1997, Leslie Heywood and Jennifer Drake wrote Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism. In 2000, Jennifer Baumgardner and Amy Richards wrote Manifesta. Baumgardner and Richards became the face of third wave feminism. People were so used to seeing white, middle-class women lead the first and second waves, they assumed white, middle-class women would lead the third wave.
We should heed the book title of third wave founder Walker:
To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism
and make feminism for everyone.

7 responses so far ↓
shag carpet bomb // January 20, 2008 at 2:07 am
I wrote a bit about Walker’s book last summer. I thought it was interesting because, while she’s a committed activist, this book was something different: it featured women — lesbian, bi, straight; asian, black, latina, white — talking about things that are often considered frivilous: high heels, lipstick, etc.
But yeah, it’s always bummed me out because i was there when third wave was happening and it was always about intersectionality and rejecting some of what the second wave stood for. i disappeared from the scene for awhile, away from feminist activities. Jump back in a couple of years ago and somehow, it all became about push up bras….
nice to se eyou have a blog finally!
shag carpet bomb // January 20, 2008 at 2:08 am
oh — and the other thing? nearly all the voices in the book were of women from middle and upper-middle class backgrounds. so, to some extent, i was a little surprised — to see a book so proudly intersectional be something so devoid of any introspection about that issue.
donnadarko // January 20, 2008 at 2:15 am
HEY shag carpet bomb! Great to see you!
Class is always last. Hope that changes.
Link Love for 2008-01-21 | A Slant Truth // January 21, 2008 at 6:27 pm
[...] Third wave feminism « Donna Darko Donna Darko takes a look at third wave feminism and mainstream feminism. (tags: womenofcolor feminism) [...]
WildlyParenthetical // January 22, 2008 at 2:19 am
This is intriguing to me… an intriguing definition of third-wave feminism, which I had always thought of as working in with the badly-named ‘difference’ feminism from those French thinkers. But you think it was an American author in 1995?
I think this is one of those things that points out, again, the extraordinary multiplicity of feminism. Although, I’m with you on wishing that ‘mainstream’ feminism was even just a little more conscious of its whiteness, its class privilege and its tendency to depoliticisation. I mean, c’mon, kids; we know better than this!
donnadarko // January 22, 2008 at 3:51 am
Third wave feminism is mainstream feminism. I waited 16 years for it to be integrated. Advocating all the while.
Feminism Friday: When women who advocate for women’s rights reject the label “feminist” « Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog // January 26, 2008 at 5:54 am
[...] that is the movement’s history and current “branding”, must it continue to be? Donna Darko makes a telling point in a post about the “Third Wave” of feminism: Then in 1995, Walker wrote To Be Real: [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.